Va. Senate bans health insurance mandate
This move would almost be admirable if the decision was made because of a firm belief that mandatory insurance is a bad thing for Virginians. After all that is what we have state government for. But, this is really just a political move because of fear of losing a re-election by supporting the federal health reform.
Va. Senate bans health insurance mandate
The Democratic-led Virginia Senate sent a strong message about health care reform efforts in Washington, D.C., on Monday (Feb. 1), passing a bill that makes it illegal for Virginians to be required to buy health insurance.
With Republicans in control of the state’s House of Delegates and governor’s mansion, the bill could become law, The Washington Post reported. The effort would throw another wrench into congressional Democrats’ plans to revamp the nation’s health care system in the wake of a special election in Massachusetts that stripped the party of its 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority in the U.S. Senate.
An “individual mandate” that requires Americans to buy health insurance is a centerpiece of federal health care legislation. Virginia’s move could suggest that President Obama — who reiterated his support for reform during his State of the Union address last week — “is failing to reassure members of his own party that current reform efforts remain worthwhile,” The Post said.
A groundswell of opposition to the federal effort is emerging in statehouses around the country, The Associated Press reported today. Bills similar to the legislation cleared by the Virginia Senate are being considered in 35 states, with some lawmakers seeking constitutional amendments to prohibit mandatory health insurance. An Idaho legislative committee has approved a bill similar to Virginia’s, and in Missouri, an overflow crowd showed up at a hearing room when that state’s constitutional amendment was being debated, the AP reported.
What is notable about Monday’s action in the Virginia Senate, however, is that Democrats joined the effort, which has been led by conservatives in most states. Five Democrats joined all 18 Republicans in opposition to a health care mandate. The votes “suggest that Democrats on the state level fear that supporting health care reform could be politically damaging,” The Post said.
SOURCE




February 3rd, 2010 at 4:41 pm
[...] Va. Senate bans health insurance mandate – http://mountainsageblog.com/2010…; 1 hour [...]
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:03 pm
[...] Va. Senate bans health insurance mandate – http://mountainsageblog.com/2010…; 50 minutes [...]
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:08 pm
I think I saw this congressman on tv talking about it today or yesterday and I had to look again at the D or R by the name because it confused me !
February 4th, 2010 at 9:58 am
I read an article last night about incumbent dems trying to distance themselves from O before November. I’m guessing this is the tactic in VA.
February 4th, 2010 at 1:21 pm
This goes to the economics of health car, not a debate not about the proposals or programs. This isn’t a tactic, it is the first step in a strategy by Virginia to refuse further Federal unfunded mandates such as forcing increases in state funded Medicaid to cover the uninsured. Since Virginia is running an over $4B deficit, and other states have even larger deficits, these unfunded Federal mandates will drive some states into insolvency. This is one of the reasons why some Democratic Senators made deals (i.e. Nelson, Landrieu and others) to attempt to shield their states from these mandates. That hasn’t worked very well for them politically because current polls indicate that these types of deals aren’t very popular.
February 4th, 2010 at 1:43 pm
I was reading on a CT blog about a 3rd party actually FINALLY being viable in the current atmosphere. When both the left and the right are mad at their parties and fighting within their parties, I think a 3rd party might actually get somewhere for a change. In the past the 3rd party candidates were more or less laughed at ,but now folks are walking away from their own party in frustration. They gave us no choice.
Sage Reply:
February 4th, 2010 at 1:57 pm
It won’t be long until everyone is mad at the third party, too. I think the problem is people expect politicians to act like decent human beings instead of slimy politicians. That’s like expecting a dog not to bark.
AliSilver Reply:
February 4th, 2010 at 3:31 pm
@Sage, Also, there is a whole slew of a younger generation who expect govt. to FIX all their problems and take care of them. Govt was not set up to do that and cannot do that. People who vote for a party they think will ‘give them more’ will always be disappointed when that party goes to DC and takes care of THEMSELVES instead. I’ve told u before about my stepdaughter. She and her husband are expecting their SECOND BABY,,, and neither work and I don’t really see any signs that they INTEND to work. They will always vote for the candidate they see as friendlier to their ‘plight’ and not to any candidate who might be out to serve the COUNTRY.