Lobbyists Stew After Being Bounced From Boards
It’s about time somebody cracked down on these damn lobbyists. The government is supposed to be WE THE PEOPLE, not we the corporations. Lobbyists shouldn’t just be bounced from federal advisory committees, they should be banned outright. There is no way our representatives can be trusted to do what is right for the people of the U.S. when they are indebted to and bought by big business. Lobbyists are angry? Good, now they know how we feel when we see our interests sold out to K Street lobbyists.
If you would like to see which industry supports which party there is an interactive application you can use to check by industry. Here is the results for the pharmaceutical industry:
Lobbyists Stew After Being Bounced From Boards
A tide of anger and dismay is rippling down K Street as the Obama administration implements a new policy limiting the roles of lobbyists on federal advisory committees.
The policy change, described by the White House as the next step in President Barack Obama ’s drive to limit influence-peddling in Washington, could affect hundreds of lobbyists who serve on the panels, which were created by Congress in the 1970s to provide private-sector advice to the government.
By removing a key point of access to the administration, many lobbyists will be less useful to their clients, who will be forced to appoint others to take up the slack. And the information about federal government intentions gleaned from committee meetings will now be unavailable to many lobbyists as they strategize on how to work various issues.
“There is fury,” said a lobbyist who sits on one of the committees. “Absolute fury.” K Street veterans say they sit at the intersection of policy wonk-dom, Washington savvy, and the needs of business, and are therefore best suited to populate the panels.
But the White House views the move as a key step in rolling back what officials see as the open-door policy for K Street created in previous years. According to a senior White House official, the panels have been excessively dominated by lobbyists. “It is one of the ways special interests have historically shaped policy to the detriment of the public interest,” he said.
via SOURCE.




October 6th, 2009 at 6:42 am
Thank you Sage for this interesting guide and link to it … these days, however, is there any real difference between the democratic and republican parties? They both seem to be guided by the same principle: greed. Democrats might/may hide their greed (through their words) a little bit better than the republicans but when one looks at their actual votes, their greed comes shining through in a glaring denial of their words. I noticed that looking at some of who contributes to which party the NBC logo falls on the democratic side of the equation … surprise, surprise:
R-E-A-L-L-Y … the NBC mouthpieces are a perfect example of just such a denial to the visual represented on the graphic.
October 6th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Oh, I love stew. Now it has crapola in it. Drats!!
But I will forgo the stew if it really means the lobbyists are being cracked down on. Let em cry!
October 6th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
The poor lobbyist’s are getting hit left and right. The FDIC has some new rules on them too. They have to report their bundling efforts now.
http://www.fec.gov/law/lobbybundlingfaq.shtml
Sage Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
I’ll set aside some time to feel sorry for them.
Ok, done.
October 6th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
See, I totally disagree with you here. Lobyists are essential in a representative democracy for getting what we the people want done. After all, the biggest group, AARP, represents just people. Furthermore, corporations are people, so all lobyists represent people.
ABCs of Columbus Sports – All about the Buckeyes, Blue Jackets, and Clippers!
Sage Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Corporations shouldn’t be considered people and have the same rights, etc. IMO. I think that’s just bullshit. Yes, AARP tries to represent people but I think they are the exception to the rule. Most corporations represent nothing but their stockholders interests.
Barga Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
They are people (assumption from Plessey), and therefore have those rights. That said, if they themselves are not people, they are the property of people. Therefore, protecting the interest of the corporation is indeed protecting the interest of the owners, thus representing them
ABCs of Columbus Sports – All about the Buckeyes, Blue Jackets, and Clippers!
Barga´s last blog ..Blu-ray Review: Fringe – The Complete First Season
Sage Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
I disagree with the assumption.
Barga Reply:
October 11th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
@Sage, So do i, but it is a SCOTUS decision
Barga´s last blog ..Obama and the Nobel Prize: When War becomes Peace, When the Lie becomes the Truth
Sage Reply:
October 12th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
Yes, I know it’s a SCOTUS decision, but that doesn’t change my opinion of it.
skyagunsta Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
@Barga, Back when Bush sat in the oval office, didn’t AARP side with the pharmaceuticals and had a hand in what has now become known as Medicare’s Donut Hole? If my memory serves me and I am correct in what my memory is trying to recall … then I, a silver haired person, really put in question AARP’s representation of WE THE PEOPLE.
Barga Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
Well, if you pay them dues, then start bitching to them
Me, i didn’t have representation until 2006, and my national people failed in election…
ABCs of Columbus Sports – All about the Buckeyes, Blue Jackets, and Clippers!
Barga´s last blog ..Blu-ray Review: Fringe – The Complete First Season
skyagunsta Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
@Barga, ws I bitching? i didn’t think I was. I thought I was just stating something. a fact, that my brain is trying to recall.
timesr Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
@skyagunsta,
I remember that AARP did support Bush’s plan and that lots of retired people were disgusted with them.
AARP sells insurance.
Sage Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
Yep, AARP, is as much about selling insurance as anything else.
leslie Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
@skyagunsta, You are absolutely correct. I canceled my AARP membership after following closely the machinations of Congress, AARP, PhRMA. In fact, I talked every member of my family (and them some) into sending back their cards as well. I was up until 4:00 a.m. watching Congress break all the rules and many arms until the bill was finalized. We lost. and we are not going to win this one either.
Sage Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
Hi there Leslie. How are you?
leslie Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 12:09 am
Hi Sage, I’m fine – just overworked, getting home late, and trying to get to bed at reasonable hours these days. I check in when I can, and don’t comment too often. I miss coming here as often as I used to.
BTW: my daughter and 2 of her friends have been taking “Calm” ever since your post re: magnesium. Your post changed her life!
How are you doing?
Sage Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 12:19 am
I’m doing pretty well, thanks for asking.
Wow…I’m so glad the magnesium has helped your daughter and her friends. I know it certainly made a huge difference in my life.
Sorry to hear you are overworked. That can create a lot of stress so please take care of ourself.
leslie Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Thanks Sage,
I am off for MD appts today, (no issues – no worries) and back to work tomorrow. But I have scheduled 2 days off next week – just to do something good and healthy for myself. I think I’m heading up to the woods in Wisconsin for some peace and quiet. Can’t wait.
Stay well.
Sage Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
I’m glad you have some time scheduled to be off. I just got back from going out with my mom today. We haven’t been out for awhile so we went shopping and to lunch.
October 7th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
The Media and Entertainment Sector was interesting… but there’s no liberal bias in media is there?
Sage Reply:
October 7th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
No, not really. Given all the attention the Tea Party and birther nuts have gotten I wouldn’t say there is a liberal bias. If there was they would have written them off as kooks and ignored them.
Desert Sage Reply:
October 7th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
@Sage,
So by your logic the pharmaceutical companies are evil because they influence our Republican bureaucrats with too much money, but big media gets a pass because they contribute to Democrats.
And the reason the liberal media focuses on the groups you mention isn’t because they think they have a valid point… that’s obvious. They want them to all look like “nuts”, which you’ve conveniently derived from the media coverage.
Sage Reply:
October 7th, 2009 at 6:03 pm
You sure read a bunch of stuff into what I say that just isn’t there. As long as you make up shit about what I said, I have nothing else to say to you.
October 7th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
The liberal Media & Entertainment lobbies contribute huge amounts to Democrats, but that’s not liberal bias or undue influence on our government. Pharmaceuticals contribute a like amount to Republicans, and that’s some corporate conspiracy against the masses.
What gives? I’m not making shit up, it’s straight from the reference you site, but conveniently ignored with respect to media contributions to Democrats. You like to focus on what supports your agenda, don’t like it when someone points it out, and are easily disturbed when someone points criticism at your opinion.
I make an assumption that you subscribe to the full context of your sited references. Not just the portions you think are relevant. Specifically what shit am I making up?
Sage Reply:
October 7th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
Didn’t I see I think all lobbyists should be banned? Well, that would include the Media and Entertainment lobbies, wouldn’t it? Yes, you are making shit up by stating I said something I didn’t say. You do it repeatedly and I’m sick of it. Either state your opinion and leave me to state mine, instead of you stating what you think my opinion is. or piss off.
If you want to talk about ALL of the industries on that web page here you go:
Split between the two parties:
Finance
Household Chemicals
Democratic Leaning
Computer/Internet
Personal Care
Media and Entertainment
Republican leaning
Airlines
Food and Beverages
Pharmaceuticals
Restaurants & Drinking
Establishments
Retail Sales
Supermarkets
Tobacco
Transportation