Supreme Court rejects school strip search
Really? A teenage girl is traumatized by a school over ibuprofen? Has America lost it’s collective mind? Can these school officials not tell the difference between fighting a serious drug problem and strip searching a teenager looking for an over the counter headache remedy?
The lunatics are running the asylum.
Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:03pm EDT
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A public school violated the privacy rights of a teenage girl who had to disrobe on suspicion she had ibuprofen pills, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in its first decision on student strip searches.
By an 8-1 vote, the justices upheld a ruling that the school and its officials violated the U.S. constitutional right that protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
The ruling by the nation’s high court was a major defeat for school officials who had defended the strip search as necessary for student safety, school order and combating a growing drug problem.
School officials in Safford, Arizona, had ordered the strip search in 2003 of Savana Redding, who was 13 and in the eighth grade. It did not turn up any ibuprofen — an over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medication used to treat fever, headaches and pain — or any other drugs.
“Because there were no reasons to suspect the drugs presented a danger or were concealed in her underwear, we hold that the search did violate the Constitution,” Justice David Souter wrote for the court majority.




June 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
Seemingly the death of common sense.
When I’ve spoken with my teacher friends, I’m amazed at how out of control the primary and secondary education has become. Little discipline, drugs, violence against teachers, etc.
The lunatics appear on both sides sometimes…
June 27th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Sadly, Sage, I think the collective assumption leans in the direction of guilt, whether there is reasonable cause or not. Not much different than the 13-year Illinois girl who received detention for hugging her friends good-bye (public displays of affection are in “poor taste”). Try walking out of Walmart without being required to show your receipt if you have an item in your basket that you’ve just purchased, but the clerk was unable to get it securely in a bag. Or try smiling at and saying “hello” to a two-year old in a grocery cart who’s been staring at you intently for several minutes, only to have the mother give you a dirty look and quickly leave the grocery aisle.
Our collective and individual psyches are reacting to the cries of danger, doom and gloom we are fed on a daily basis.
I’ve been on vacation and just catching up on your posts. Good ones.
Sage Reply:
June 27th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Hi terri, welcome back! I hope you had a great vacation.
I agree that we’ve become a nation of skeptics and we tend to think people are guilty until proved innocent.
July 5th, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Still can not believe that Thomas said it was cool
Sage Reply:
July 5th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Hey there. Thomas was, in my opinion, sooooooooooo wrong.
barga Reply:
July 5th, 2009 at 10:13 pm
He always is
the token black dude and yet acts like a rich white GOP
Sage Reply:
July 5th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
LOL Interesting take on Thomas.
barga Reply:
July 5th, 2009 at 10:38 pm
most of us who discuss constitutional law and the like call him that